Why we should ignore Julie Bindel’s presence at Nottingham Women’s Conference 2014

The take-home message from last year’s Nottingham Women’s Conference was surely that, if the event were to be repeated, much more effort needed to be made to consult different groups and be open-minded, inclusive and balanced from early on in the planning.

The uncomfortable drama of last year’s conference was triggered by current sex workers not being given a voice in the content related to sex work – this long but excellent blog from local feminist Uncharted Worlds explains further.

When I saw that they had booked Julie Bindel as a speaker for this year’s conference, I realised if lessons had been learned, they were the wrong lessons. I am not qualified to discuss sex work, but I suggest that choosing a speaker with a history of a similar kind of problematic commentary around sex work is rather provocative after the events of last year.

In addition, the booking of Bindel speaks to a systemic issue with the conference that marginalises other groups as well. Bindel has historically been called out for problematic comments about transgender people and bisexuals, and my personal reaction towards hearing her name associated with the conference was, “I will not be safe there”. I know I am not the only person having this reaction. This, of course, is the easiest way to exclude people – not to actually say “you’re not included” but to make the space uncomfortable, a little like making sure the chairs only fit cisgender bottoms.

Transgender people are likely to feel unwelcome because Bindel is “transcritical” – she feels entitled to speak for and about transgender lives, rights and surgery in a disparaging and dismissive manner. To be clear, Bindel apologised for the worst of her comments about transgender people, made in 2004, but to this day she continues to speak against us being given access to medical treatment. This is comparable to a man speaking on the subject of a woman’s right to abortion.

Bindel, as a Guardian columnist, has a strong platform for her views and her “brand”. Intersectional feminism would hold that it is simply unacceptable to use your power to undermine the rights and the voice of one of society’s most vulnerable minorities. It would say that it is for transgender people themselves to work out where they fit in relation to feminism, how to integrate theories about gender inequality and social construction within their lived experience of being transgender, and how to negotiate the power structures of the medical profession and “Big Pharma”.

Trans feminists are aware of all these concerns and are having a vibrant, radical discussion – it is not for others to impose their views from a position of superiority (and often surprising ignorance), nor to ensure that their negative opinions are heard above those of transitioning people themselves.

Bindel, in an interview with Paris Lees in 2013, identifies herself as fitting the description of a transgender person, presumably as a means of avoiding the accusation of cis privilege. However, cis and trans are not binaries but a continuum; just as South American people may experience racism but should not speak for African people, gender non-conforming people who are comfortable with their birth sex assignment do not have the same experiences as many other transgender people and cannot speak for them.

Bindel will talk at the conference of her experience of being “no platformed”. Although we have been assured she will not speak about trans people, calls for her to not be given a platform at certain events were connected to her transcritical views. It is hard to see how Bindel will not seek to convince listeners, as she does in the above interview, that she is being “silenced” by transgender people – that is, that she is the victim and they are the threat. The perception of transgender people as a threat could, of course, lead to further oppression and marginalisation. It is an easy way to hold back a civil rights movement; to constantly highlight the worst behaviour of some activists.

It is important to highlight the economic, institutional and academic power of folks like Julie Bindel, Sheila Jeffreys, Germaine Greer, Janice Raymond, Julie Birchill and other transcritical feminists. Whilst women’s rights have a very long way to go, we should not be blind to the fact these individuals are now inside the system (or cis-tem, if you like) and have a certain amount of institutional power. As such, I think it is for these individuals to reflect more on how they silence other voices than on how they are silenced.

There will inevitably be a twitter storm over this. A lot of frustrated, marginalised people are likely to get angry and some may say things they regret. Somebody, somewhere may well say “f*** off and die” or something similarly unhelpful in a heated moment and then it will go down in cistory that transgender people (all of us) make credible, violent death threats and cannot be trusted.

All this drama is so predictable it’s almost as if it is being orchestrated. It looks like shock doctrine; a way of stirring people up and manipulating them in order to gain power and control. The controversy will no doubt sell plenty of tickets, but please remember that it is as fabricated as the “War on Terror”.

Meanwhile, folks like myself are genuinely triggered into a trauma response, because every time stuff like this happens, trans people get more marginalised within feminism, and our social support, the thing that is intimately connected to our mental wellbeing, lessens. I personally would rather devote my time and energy into dismantling patriarchy than feel sick with worry about whether it’s ever going to be safe for people like me in feminist spaces in Nottingham.

I need to be allowed to speak up and say I don’t feel safe in any space that allows a platform for transcriticism or notorious transcritics. I have stated my reasons for this previously. These imperious and damaging ideas have enough of a platform – I cannot go online without stumbling into them. Ignoring and sidelining the views of powerful people with Guardian columns is not “silencing” anyone, it is redressing a massive power imbalance.

That being said I am not going to engage in campaigning against Bindel’s invitation. Partly because it is too traumatising, but also because it would appear to be exactly what is being invited, and I do not want to serve an agenda that seeks to marginalise trans people even further.

I urge the intersectional feminist community and all elements within it to ignore this provocation – a lot to ask, I know, but please don’t feed this monster.

What I am interested in doing is getting together with other (non-transcritical) feminists in Nottingham and discussing how we can make Nottingham’s feminist spaces safer for transgender people. A meeting, led by Nottingham’s Intersectional Feminism group, will be happening in October. Contact me if you’re interested (go to the “about” section of this blog), and let’s build a more collaborative future built on consciousness raising and self-reflection. There’s work to be done here, but it isn’t going to happen on Twitter.

8 thoughts on “Why we should ignore Julie Bindel’s presence at Nottingham Women’s Conference 2014

  1. Eleanor

    Hi Sandy, as an outwardly (and mostly) cis-gendered straight woman, I can honestly say that Julie Bindel scares me stupid! She provokes heated criticism by bating everyone and then turns it round, as opportunity and her agenda dictate, to claim that she is the victim of trans people/men/non-lesbians/the wrong kind of feminists, etc. She is like a person who claims that a dog is dangerous because it’s bitten her but conceals the fact that she has been torturing it until it snaps. I read her column in the Guardian for the sole purpose of reading the comments at the end and seeing just how many people of all genders/orientations disagree with her. That gives me hope!
    I fully support your decision not to protest against her because protest is precisely what she wants so that she can whine about how hard done by she is and obscure all the justified criticism of her prejudiced, narrow minded, and vindictive views.
    All the best, Eleanor

    Reply
  2. Pingback: Nottingham Women’s Conference – Update | A Feminist Challenging Transphobia

  3. moonsingerzero

    I’m attending the conference and am looking forward to hearing Julie Bindel speak because I believe that non platforming women shuts down debate and women need to be able to debate their views on their position in Patriarchy. I’ve heard her speak before, she is funny and personable and hardly scary. I’m sorry that even the thought of her speaking is ‘triggering’ for you. The thought of women being silenced for having differing political views is ‘triggering’ for many women too.

    Reply
    1. Sam Hope Post author

      Let’s be clear, I have never said Julie Bindel should be no-platformed, I have said that choosing her out of all possible speakers to address a conference, in a town where work is being done to build bridges between the trans and feminist communities, is a transparently divisive act, intended to incite fighting between our communities when some of us are working for peace. Choosing to have her speak to a topic related to her long campaign to delegitimize trans people out of all the feminist topics up for discussion, is putting the trans community back into the firing line, particularly as a pretense is being made that she has been no-platformed for her views on patriarchy, as opposed to her views on a very vulnerable and marginalised minority.

      I believe, out of all the amazing speakers in this world that someone as powerful as Bindel could easily stand aside for 3 billion other women whose voices won’t be heard at this conference. Let’s not forget that in courting inevitable controversy like this by booking Bindel, the conference has made a choice which women to promote and which to brush aside (and effectively silence, if not booking someone for a conference is indeed “silencing” them). It has also made a choice to draw everyone’s attention onto the subject of the legitimacy of trans people and away from topics such as racism within feminism, FGM, abortion, domestic violence, rape and sexual abuse, women being unduly affected by austerity, and a million other subjects which are considerably more important to most of the women in this community.

      I would like to draw attention to the rather ableist way you put quotation marks around the word triggering, as if triggering was some made up internet term rather than a cognitive behavioural term associated with trauma. Belittling people’s trauma is so horribly ableist I almost did not let your comment pass – I apologise to anyone who has been hurt by reading this, but I felt it important to expose the linguistic trickery some people use to undermine trans people. The number of trans people suffering from PTSD following their experiences is staggering, and PTSD is not something any feminist should be belittling.

      Finally, I just want to point out that this old cry of “silencing” has been used by men for years – “your political correctness is controlling me”, they say – “you can’t say anything these days”, they say, when they discover they can no longer get away with calling their secretary “hot totty”. Yes, we silence them, or try to, when their words are oppressive. Yes, we will try to shush people like Bindel, in the same way we will try to shush our racist grandparent when friends come round to tea – because ignorant, outdated language about minorities is embarrassing, because it’s awkward, and because it’s frankly oppressive.

      Reply
  4. Pingback: Street Harassment in Nottingham: The Problems with Policing « Nottingham SOLFED

  5. Pingback: I’m in an abusive relationship with Julie Bindel | The Queerness

  6. Pingback: I’m in an abusive relationship with Julie Bindel | A Feminist Challenging Transphobia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s